Democracy, War and the Media - Uneasy Bedfellows All Round

Recent international wars and the often spectacularIraq' by Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber as "A
ways in which the established media is covering them,major contribution for those who want to take control
have given media researchers ample opportunity toof their own future, not be passive subjects of
see whether technological developments are giving usmanipulation and control."The book is a detailed
the opportunity to have a closer experience ofaccount of how the world's top ad agencies and
democracy.It is logical to assume that new technologymedia empires were hired by the US government to
empowers us all. To have a better idea of what ismake the invasion in Iraq into a concept no one in their
going on in the most inaccessible of situations isright American mind could possibly think of as wrong
believed to contribute to our sense of involvement andand in which the big words democracy, freedom and
enhances our democratic rights. Hyper-moderntotalitarianism were featuring as if they were part of a
communication technologies are extremely useful innational marketing campaign for some kind of
providing the ordinary citizen with greater access toconsumer product.The happy feeling of winning a war
more, faster-paced and better researched news andmight have stretched just about far enough to gain
news background information. The greater ouranother round of elections for the US conservatives,
freedom of information the more of a say we feel webut complaints of numbness are increasingly being
have. And the better our lives become - right?Newtaken seriously by larger parts of the population in this
insights in the role of the media's empowerment bycountry. Perhaps one positive outcome of the war is
high tech equipment started with the first gulf War inthat it has focused more attention to the methods
Iraq, the coverage of which was totally dominated byemployed by leaders to convey their message to the
CNN. When the US set out to police the world somepublic.Talk of a numb, heartless, cold, harsh society is
more in Somalia other broadcast stations were betternothing new but evidence of really clever toxology
prepared, and Sarajevo became known as thefixed up by political parties and spread through media
internet reporting war. The latest struggles indevices it's becoming an unavoidable focus point in the
Afghanistan and Iraq witnessed a total press-friendlywider debate about especially the US society. The
war, with journalists of all mainstream and someway the US press machine has been fine tuned to
alternative media with their noses bang on thereceive messages by the conservative party is
action.As the war in Iraq, cleverly branded "Operation:portrayed by the progressive personality Rob Stein
Iraqi Freedom" by the US government, is not likely to(formerly Commerce Department) who compiled a
be ending this year and as troops in Afghanistan aredetailed overview of how exactly messages are sent
also not anywhere near leaving, the debate is focusedout to which media, when and where. From his
on whether interventions were based on facts ratherresearch you can see that what's been guised as a
than misleading accounts of what was happening oncampaign to build community feeling has effectively
the ground. The media, accusing the government ofbecome the highly organised conservative party
spin doctoring its actions beyond what is healthy, areextension that can mobilise entire regions in a jiff. "[they
themselves accused of having become victims orhave] built a strategic, coordinated, disciplined,
willing puppets on a string by the very people theywell-financed community of local, regional and national
ought to be keeping a check on.Propaganda, that oldorganizations, which collectively can mobilize a majority
fashioned concept generally associated with dictators,progressive constituency", says Stein.His research
appears to have become very much a live conceptillustrates how the machine was built from its earliest
again during the last few years. We never had theuntil the last elections and reveals that the effort went
privilige of banning it from our daily lives, but think tanksunderway during the early 1970s in response to a
and other civil organisation focusing on modernlargely intangible fear that capitalism was on its way
propaganda techniques report a markedly higherback. The network of NGOs out there is around 80,
interest in the phenomenon in recent years. Thelarge "non-partisan" groups. These are financed by
heightened interest itself indicates a new tendency toprivate -conservative- initatives with funds stretching to
mistrust our leaders.What the think tanks report backan estimated USD400 million annually.Stein's findings
to people on current-day leaders is no less reassuring.are an excellent backdrop to beginning to understand
Pointing out the various levels on which propaganda ishow a nation can be prepared for war without
part and parcel of the message sent to us, you mightnecessarily using many overt lies. News stations were
begin to wonder how fast asleep we are even thoughbeing fed facts by 'experts' trained to purport one
we'd like to think we have a handle on reality. Althoughparticular stream of thought. Stein reckons that around
we're not necessarily faced continuously with the36,000 members of the conservative party now
same blatant and ugly lies Hitler and Stalin dreamt up inworking in a independent think tank have received
the 1930s, there is a plethora of examples of halftraining on media-specific issues. If a news anchor
truths and similarly poisonous messages being sent outdecides -of his own free will- to discuss a particular
to the masses by the media broadcasttopic, he'll turn to think tanks, legal groups, media
machine.Biggest excuse? There's a war on. Even inorganisations, networking groups, and very likely
normal times, it is impossible not to live with someencounter highly versatile individuals, not -and this is the
degree of propaganda but when a common enemytricky business- 'elected officials' but nevertheless
needs destroying, we somewhat forgive our leaderspeople who form the 'cadre' of the conservative
and the media for collaborating in what everyonenetwork, trained by what's known as the 'Leadership
knows is a circus. "Probably every conflict is fought onInstitute'.With this much of a system in place, the
at least two grounds: the battlefield and the minds ofinvasion in Iraq took place after the public had been
the people via propaganda. The "good guys" and thewell-prepared for the footage on tv. Philip Knightley, the
"bad guys" can often both be guilty of misleading theirauthor of 'First Casualty, a history of war reporting',
people with distortions, exaggerations, subjectivity,wrote a razor sharp prognosis of what the
inaccuracy and even fabrications, in order to receivepropaganda formula entailed in the first days following
support and a sense of legitimacy", one media2001 September 11, and outlined in his article how the
institution writes on its website.Avoiding the blatant lie,patterns were likely going to evolve as the
most Western leaders these days are guilty ofgovernment prepared the public opinion for conflict. He
spreading propagandistic messages, both when theydivided the process into stage one; public speeches
address the public about their role in the war AND inabout the crisis; stage two, public speeches demonising
ordinary situations. In essence, all propaganda is harmfulof the enemy's leader; stage three, public speeches in
to democracy, even though many people tend to thinkwhich the enemy as individuals in a group are
of the less intensive forms as modern spin doctoringdemonised; and stage four, a justification of resulting
or clever PR.The ultimate result from all propagandaatrocities. He then proceeded to outline where the US
that reaches its goal, in whatever form, is totalpresident was in the process and what he was likely
passiveness of the people that believe the theto undertake next. He appeared to be eerily spot on
message. Fears that the media is poisoned to thisand his was among the first articles in the media that
effect have been widespread in the US and the UKwas a pre cursor to the avalanche of public upset.Talk
over the past two years. Noam Chomsky, the popularof an invasion in Iraq started immediately after the 9/11
left wing scholar in the US, hits the nail on the headattacks and was accompanied by exactly the kind of
describing the best-seller 'Weapons of Masspropagandistic rhetoric the history books write about.
Deception, The Uses of Propaganda in Bush's War on