| When it comes to plasma vs LCD TV screen size, | | | | TVs. The latter improved their refresh rates because |
| plasma TVs has the advantage, they are the current | | | | they were designed for data display. |
| size champion, but the developing technology of LCD | | | | When it comes to weight, LCD TVs are lighter, more |
| TVs is catching up, they also have screen sizes that | | | | portable and cheaper to ship. With this comparisson |
| range from 32 to 63 inches. Panasonic does make a | | | | screen durability test, the LCD TVs win they are a lot |
| this kind of television that is 103 inches, but it is not for | | | | less fragile than the other kinde. For the other hand the |
| consumer use. | | | | plasma type are so fragile that they are tricky to ship |
| When you compare viewing angles, plasma vs LCD | | | | and also to install. Installation of a television of this kind |
| TV screen, the latter screen has the advantage. The | | | | should be done by a professional while the others can |
| advantage is only a small margin. The viewing angle | | | | be self installed. |
| for a plasma TV is up to 160 degrees and the viewing | | | | Plasma vs LCD TV screen product lifespan is not an |
| angle for an the second type of television is up to 175 | | | | effective way to differentiate them. Former have a |
| degrees. | | | | reported half life of 30,000 to 60,000 hours. The |
| Screen refresh rates vary only slightly with plasma vs | | | | average CRT television, the kind most of us have at |
| LCD TV screen technology. The former displays | | | | home, has a half-life of around 25,000 hours. |
| refresh and handle rapid movements in video like CRT | | | | |