Choosing a New Camera

With so many camera models to choose from wherethey have unless they have had some trouble with it,
do you start? Well, the way I choose any new toyeven then people are very forgiving. I think the reason
these days is to start at the end. What do you want itfor this is that people think that, if they have made the
to do? Err . . . take pictures. Yes but what kind ofwrong choice it is because they have somehow failed,
pictures and what are you going to do with them? Theand they are not going to admit their failure. Back in the
other burning question is how much are you prepared1980s I had a camera shop in England and at the time
to learn?As you are reading this and have actuallya lot of people, who already owned an SLR, were
made it to paragraph two, I think we can assume thatbuying compact cameras 'for the wife'. They would
you are prepared to learn at least a little. So what doask me which brand was the best and, if I didn't
you want to do? Do you want something that you canalready know, I would discreetly try to find out which
keep in your pocket at all times so you can snap thebrand of SLR they owned, then I would recommend
kids? Do you want a camera that will allow you tothe same brand of compact camera.Trying to sell
take pictures in any lighting conditions from anythem another brand was like telling them they had
distance (with the right gadget screwed on the frontmade a wrong choice when buying their old camera
of course)? Is this going to be a hobby or just someand was likely to lose me a sale. So I'd better have a
quick snaps?The Learning CurveI haven't seen anyreally good reason for not recommending the Canon,
cameras on sale in recent years that do not have aOlympus, Nikon, Pentax or whatever and I didn't have
fully automatic 'point and shoot' mode, most willone. All of the well known brands produce similar
automatically switch on the flash for you when it iscameras at similar prices and, by and large, you get
needed so you may wonder why we need all thewhat you pay for.I will stick my neck out a little bit here
other manual and semi automatic modes and anand say that in my humble opinion the manufacturers
instruction book to make your head spin. The answerwho make the best film cameras the Japanese Nikon,
is that, although the camera can produce goodCanon, Olympus, Pentax, Minolta and the German
exposures most of the time, there are times when, toContax and Leica seem to make the best digital
get the results we want, we have to apply a littlecameras. I would not be too happy to put my trust in
knowhow and select more appropriate settings thanbrands whose traditional expertise is in other fields
the camera would automatically choose.Beforewhen there are such good cameras available from the
choosing a camera with lots of knobs and dials it is atraditional sources. I will probably get a lot of hate mail
good idea to consider whether you are ever going tofrom people who have bought Sony cameras or
bother to learn what they are all for. I've been aroundHewlett Packard and are perfectly happy with them. If
cameras for many years now, and I'm still learningI wanted a printer Hewlett Packard would be top of
what all the settings on my latest camera actually do. Imy list and I am a huge fan of Sony video and TV
never bother to learn how to do something until I needequipment but my first choice for a digital SLR would
to. So there are certain obscure settings that I havebe one of the names mentioned above.How Many
yet to find a use for. Of course it would be nice if wePixels?Until recently the quality of digital cameras was
could choose just the buttons we need and have eachmeasured by how many pixels they boasted. Now we
camera custom made for us but in the real world allhave cameras that can produce tens of millions and it
we can do is choose the level of control based onhas ceased to be the only test of quality. In the real
how much we think we might want to get involved.world the number of pixels you need depends on how
Generally speaking an SLR will have more knobs, dialsbig you want to print your pictures. If you mainly want
and menus than a compact camera which will givepostcard size or A5 then I would consider 4 million
you more control over your pictures but will have apixels to be perfectly adequate. Even at A4 size I
much steeper learning curve.SLR or Compact?All thewould be hard pushed to tell the difference between
cameras on the market can be categorised into a fewmy 4 million pixel camera and my 6.5 million pixel
simple groups. The most important two groups arecamera. Don't forget though that your cropping in the
fixed lens and interchangeable lens. The fixed lenscamera may not always be perfect so you may be
cameras tend, with a few exceptions, to be smaller,enlarging only a portion of the image and so only using
lighter and more pocketable, therefore you are morea portion of the available pixels.Although an adequate
likely to have it with you when you need it. Well that'snumber of pixels is important, the quality of your picture
the theory anyway but I think we can say that you arewill be greatly affected by the quality of the lens.
more likely to be bothered to take it with you on thatWhen Canon recently updated the EOS 300D (digital
outing to the beach or the zoo.However even withrebel) with 6.5 million pixels to the EOS 350D with 8
today's zoom lenses, which are pretty wonderful, youmillion pixels, the general consensus amongst
will often find that you are too far away or too closereviewers seemed to be that the money you needed
to get the picture you want so you need to be able toto spend on an upgrade would be better spent on a
change the lens for a longer telephoto or a widerbetter quality lens. So the answer to the pixel question
angle. The other major advantage of these single lensis that we seem to have now reached a point where
reflex (SLR) cameras is that you are actually lookingenough is enough.There is also a school of thought
through the lens instead of a separate viewfinder sothat we have reached the limit of the number of photo
what you see is what you get, although this is less ofsensors that we can fit on a chip and that a greater
an issue now that we can review our photos on thenumber will cause the individual cells to be too small
screen of the digital camera. The down side of thesecompared to the space in between them. Usually
SLR cameras is that you very soon end up with quitethough, when someone says something like that, the
a heavy bag of gadgets and are less likely to carry itfollowing week the boffins announce a breakthrough
everywhere with you. However much I yearn for awhich makes it all nonsense. You may have seen
compact camera for it's handyness I know I would beadverts for cameras, costing many thousands, that
frustrated by it's shortcomings so for me the choice ishave 16 or 20 million pixels. These have sensors that
SLR every time.Digital or Film?Do they still make filmare twice the size of those in the consumer cameras,
cameras? Oh yes they do and I wouldn't mind bettinghence the price. To me, the resolution of a 6 or 8
that they continue to do so for many years and Imillion pixel camera with a decent lens seems good
wouldn't mind betting that at some time in the futureenough for most purposes and on a par with the
there will be a retro backlash and a large number ofquality I used to get from a 35mm film camera.In the
'serious' photographers will return to the darkroom.past I have spent a lot of time and money in the
Some will probably claim that they have never usedpursuit of ultimate quality, I have owned a 5x4inch plate
digital at all, ever.You might think from the remarkscamera, a Hassleblad and two Mamiya medium
above that I am a diehard supporter of film. Nothingformat cameras, every major brand of 35mm camera
could be further from the truth actually I am now fullyand in the end, I would be hard pushed to tell you
converted to digital and loving it. I am going to makewhich photo on the wall was taken with which camera.
the pros and cons a separate discussion that will beA fellow photographer once observed that
posted soon but, for now, I'll just say that I amphotographers tend to smell pictures rather than look
completely sold on digital and do not feel that I haveat them, by which he meant that they were more
lost anything significant by changing.Which brand?This,interested in the graininess and sharpness of the image
of course, is the big question that you really want anthan the actual image itself.Geoff Lawrence has been
answer to and you know that nobody is going to givea professional photographer for many years and now
you one. If you ask anyone who already has aruns a website offering advice to people who want to
camera most will support the brand of the cameraimprove their photography.