Google's Good-Writing Filter

I was recently struck by the fact that the top-rankingappear more than three times, meaning a very low
web pages on Google are consistently much betterdensity. Many of the pages did not contain the
written than the vast majority of what one reads onkeyword at all.
the web. Yet traditional SEO wisdom has little to saySub-headings. On most pages, sub-headings were
about good writing. Does Google, the world'seither absent or in the form of images rather than text.
wealthiest media company, really rank web pages
based primarily on arcane technical criteria such asLinks: Most of the web pages contained ten or more
keyword density, link text, or evenlinks; many contain over 30, in defiance of the SEO
PageRank?Apparently not.bugbears about "link popularity bleeding." Moreover,
Most Common Website Content Success FactorsInearly all the pages contained a significant number of
took a close look at the top five pages for the fivenon-relevant links. On many pages, non-relevant links
most searched-on keywords, as identified byoutnumbered relevant ones.
WordTracker on June 27, 2005. Here's what IText content: a significant number of pages contained
found.The web pages that contained written contentlittle or no text. These pages were almost all image
(a small but significant portion were image galleries) allgalleries (there was one Flash movie), with the images
shared the following features:being photographs of the subject covered by the
keyword.
Updating: frequent updating of content, at least onceOriginality: a significant number of pages contained
every few weeks, and more often, once a week orcontent copied from other websites. In all cases, the
more.content was professionally written content apparently
Spelling and grammar: few or no errors. No page haddistributed on a free-reprint basis. Note: the reprint
more than three misspelled words or four grammaticalcontent did not consist of content feeds. However, no
errors. Note: spelling and grammar errors werewebsite consisted solely of free-reprint content. There
identified by using Microsoft Word's check feature, andwas always at least a significant portion of original
then ruling out words marked as misspellings that arecontent, usually the majority of the
either proper names or new words that are simply notpage.Recommendations
in the dictionary. Google almost certainly has betterMake sure a professional writer, or at least someone
access to new words than the dictionary, with itswho can tell good writing from bad, is creating your
database of billions of web pages. Supposedsite's content, particularly in the case of a
grammatical errors that did not in fact violate stylesearch-engine optimization campaign. If you are an
rules were also ignored. Google would certainly be lessSEO, make sure you get a pro to do the content. A
conservative than a grammar checker in evaluatingshocking number of SEOs write incredibly badly. I've
popular stylistic devices such as sentence fragments.even had clients whose websites got fewer
Paragraphs: primarily brief (1-4 sentences). Few or noconversions or page views after their SEOs got
long blocks of text.through with them, even when they got a sharp uptick
Lists: both bulleted and numbered, form a large part ofin unique visitors. Most visitors simply hit the "back"
the text.button when confronted with the unpalatable text, so
Sentence length: mostly brief (10 words or fewer).the increased traffic is just wasted bandwidth.
Medium-length and long sentences are sprinkledIf you write your own content, make sure that it
throughout the text rather than clumped together.passes through the hands of a skilled copyeditor or
Contextual relevance: text contains numerous termswriter before going online.
related to the keyword, as well as stem variations ofUpdate your content often. It's important both to add
the keyword. The page may contain the keywordnew pages and update existing pages. If you can't
itself few times or not at all.afford original content, use free-reprint content.
SEO "Do's" and "Don'ts" that Don't Really MatterADistribute your content to other websites on a
hard look at the results slaughters a number of SEOfree-reprint basis. This will help your website get links in
bugbears and sacred cows.PageRank. The medianexchange for the right to publish the content. It will also
PageRank was 4. One page had a PageRank of 0.help spread your message and enhance your visibility.
(Note that the low PageRank would seem to discountFears of a "duplicate content penalty" for free-reprint
the idea that these pages owe their ranking completelycontent (as opposed to duplication of content within a
to numerous incoming links.)single website) are unjustified.
Frames. The top two web pages listed for the mostIn short, make sure the bulk of your investment in your
searched-on keyword employ frames.website is devoted to its content, rather than graphic
JavaScript-formatted internal links. Most of thedesign, old-school search-engine optimization, or linking
websites use JavaScript for their internal page links.campaigns. Joel Walsh is the owner, founder and
Keyword optimization. Except for two pages,head-writer of UpMarket Content. To read more about
keyword optimization was conspicuous by its absence.website content best practices, get a consultation with
In more than half the web pages, the keyword did notMr.