Making Memorable Art - The Power Of Story

It was the eve of my trip to California, touring the firstpushed the new fashion to unprecedented heights of
group of oils from my 'Banjo Paterson's People' series.hyperbole and obscene prices. And each novelty,
The pictures to be exhibited were being previewed forregardless of its worthiness by any standard except
Australian collectors at a cocktail party hosted by thefashion, was hailed as a masterpiece as soon as it hit
gallery which represented my work at thethe market.But we need to be sure we're all 'on the
time.Suddenly, a trendy local architect loomed upsame page' when we discuss Abstract Art. The
beside me, champagne flute in hand. Looking down theofficially accepted definition specifies: art in which the
considerable length of his nose at me, he commented,portrayal of things from the visible world plays no part.
'So, you're really an illustrator, I see.'No recognisable objects can be included. It follows that
I beamed up at him and gushed, 'Oh, thank you!'there can be no such thing as an 'Abstract portrait' or
His smirk made his thought transparent: (She's too'Abstract landscape.' Those paintings mis-named as
dumb to even realise she's just been insulted.)Then Isuch should properly be described as 'Figurative.'The
added: 'You've elevated me into the company ofastonishing body of work by Picasso (1881-1973), which
Michelangelo and Leonardo, Raphael and Rembrandt.'covers 80 years of innovation and experiment,
As his jaw hit his chest, it was clear the truth had hitcontains no works that are actually Abstract, so far as
him between the eyes, and I walked away, chuckling.I know. If you have found one, I would like to hear
Now, why could I dare list my work alongside theabout it.A true form of Abstract painting can be found
Masters? Because their 'book' was The Bible; minein the work of 'Colour Field' painters such as Mark
was 'Banjo' Paterson (1864-1941.)(That night, I didn'tRothko (1903-1970) and his many imitators. On these -
bother to point out that of close to 300 titles in myalways vast - canvases, geometric shapes are filled
Register of sold paintings at the time, only 33 werewith colour, sometimes solid, sometimes transparent.
based on Paterson poems or stories. The currentSometimes they are given titles apparently freighted
totals are 400 and 63, plus 30 illustrations of my ownwith mysterious meaning e.g. The Existential Sadness
version of the story of Paterson's words to 'Waltzingof Happiness. Sometimes the title is more honest: a
Matilda.')But back to the Masters:When you standstark Untitled #14. And when you leave the museum
gazing up at the massive marble sculpture of David bywhere they are displayed, can you recall which design
Michelangelo, you know it can be no one else but thetold of 'The sadness of happiness' or which extolled
youth who challenged and defeated Goliath. Yet, itThe kindness of cruelty?' Can you differentiate
might be anyone. He stands naked of any identifyingbetween Untitled #7 and Untitled #13 from
costume. And in this portrait - of the young manmemory?Picasso never lost sight of the power of
destined to become the second Jewish king - he isStory. Only think of his incandescent protest against
shown not circumcised. We are given only one clue:the futile brutality of war in 'Guernica.' Or the
the slingshot. But that is enough.Still, as you know, nopsychological power of his series based on the ancient
artist is content to simply illustrate the facts. S/he ismyths of the Minotaur. It seems to me that all forms of
thinking always of how to present those facts in aart are servant to the Story. Let me show you why I
new way; a way that will stimulate the viewers ownthink that.The Movie:This has to be the most perfect
imaginations, start them thinking about more than theart form, I think. It combines all the classic forms,
remembered story. Michelangelo pared awayembellished by the many technological innovations now
everything superfluous. No action is evident in theavailable and who knows what wonders yet to come.
sculpture. But every gesture of the figure, the complexYet, without a Story, there is no movie.The
expression of the face, tells us that something is aboutNovel:Attempts have been made to produce a novel
to happen.Leonardo was thinking the same way whendevoid of narrative. Famous examples include
he made The Last Supper. The great innovation here'Finnegan's Wake' and 'Ulysses' by James Joyce
is the placement of Judas on the same side of the(1882-1941.) Complex constructions using devices of
table as all the other disciples, a breakaway from the'interior monologue' and the 'stream-of-consciousness,'
tradition of isolating the betrayer by seating him apart.these books fascinate literary critics. But have you
In the hands of the Master painter, all that's needed isever read them? Do you know anyone who
the expression on the face of Judas and the gesturehas?Architecture:If I mentioned the Sydney Opera
of his figure.Both masters used every skill ofHouse or Notre Dame cathedral, you would not need
craftsmanship at their disposal to engage oura photograph to remind you of them. You would
emotional response to the work and the story it tells.immediately see a mind-picture of them. Two buildings
And even today, these images, made 500 years ago,set far apart in time, they reflect the very different
fill our minds when we think of those ancient stories.Story of the people who raised them.Then think of a
How is that for memorable art?Now, jump to Newskyscraper, the icon of modernity.Except for those
York post-WWII, when Abstract Expressionism wastopped with identifying decorations, or those endowed
riding the crest of its wave. Abstract Art waswith emotional signifigance like the twin towers of the
declared the successor of all art that had comeWorld Trade Center in New York, you would be hard
before, a new broom sweeping away theput to say which city housed any one typical box. A
unfashionable traditions of representational art. Andfounding father of the skyscraper, Louis Sullivan
with it, a new dogma was proclaimed: 'Narrative is(1856-1924), believed 'form follows function' and the
dead!'I believe all artists from Kandinsky (1866-1944) toskyscraper embodies that principle. Its function is to fit
the latest 'name' in 'Modern Art' circles have beenthe largest number of paying tenants into the smallest
genuine in their desire to revolutionise art bypiece of high-priced real estate. And its design clearly
experimenting with (seemingly) new ways of layingstates its lack of interest in who those tenants might
paint on a surface. Left to themselves, they wouldbe.Music:When you listen to a recording of, say, 'Hall Of
have done no harm. Art is the biggest game weThe Mountain King' by Edvard Grieg, you have no
humans have invented, and within it there is room forneed to know about the folk stories that inspired him.
all manner of playfulness. But some art dealers, andBut you will see pictures in your mind as you listen. And
those critics who served them, soon awoke to theyet, unless you are a classical musician, you are unlikely
golden opportunity this new art presented.There areto be able to hum the entire composition in the shower.
people who have much money but little confidence inThis is because there are no words to help you recall
their own taste, others who feel the need to display athe music. Incidentally, this is why 'Banjo' Paterson
'sophistication' above that of their fellows. Then therescribbled some verses that we can sing along with, to
are those who must demonstrate their superiority bythe old marching song we now know as 'Waltzing
possessing whatever is the latest, or most exclusive.Matilda.'So when the trendoids try to convince us that
They were the perfect targets for the purveyors of'Narrative is dead,' my answer is a giant raspberry that
this new style of art that was presented as beyondsays: 'Oh, yeah?
the understanding of 'the common people.' They